In May, the Director of Public Prosecutions, Roger Gaspard, ordered a probe into prison litigation matters and the prospect of criminal wrongdoing.

It followed a letter sent by former solicitor general Elandor Donaldson-Honneywell to then Prime Minister Kamla Persad-Bissessar in August 2013. Donaldson-Honeywell flagged concerns of col­lu­sion in­volv­ing at­tor­neys in cas­es against the state.

She claimed there were con­cerns about a breach of pro­fes­sion­al ethics for in­di­rect or di­rect fi­nan­cial gain, adding that she was con­cerned the at­tor­neys were en­gaged in an un­eth­i­cal busi­ness ven­ture. She also referred to the retaining of lawyers by the Office of the AG to defend the state in civil law claims. However, those said attorneys challenged the state in prison matters.

Then, there was another alarming discovery; prisoners’ injuries were ‘copy and paste’ in many cases and the evidence wasn’t able to substantiate such injuries. The attorneys involved were former UNC Senator Gerald Ramdeen and Varun Debideen. Ironically, Ramdeen representated the state in civil matters.

The practice was first unearthed by High Court Master Patricia Sobion-Awai in an assault and battery lawsuit filed by Jamal Sambury. The ruling was referred to the Disciplinary Committee of the Law Association. This, is why the DPP ordered a probe into what he said could be a criminal conspiracy to pervert the course of public justice and conspiracy to defraud the State.

The Prisongate investigation is no longer limited to just the alleged “cutting and pasting” of witness statements but has taken on a more organised crime element which has seen millions of dollars pocketed by attorneys.

The lawyers successfully won cases against the state for damages to be paid to the appellants who in many cases were less fortunate members of society. Reports say the majority had their matters heard and they won.

However, they weren’t even aware that their cases were challenged. Some of the matters where the state awarded “too little damages” were appealed without their knowledge. Witness statements and claim forms bore their names but fradulent signatures.


Author: Dareece Polo


Want To Share? Use the Social Media Icons in the Bottom-Right of the Screen to Share the Post!